5
ent of betsɔtamamoo ed satʊoo sub ni bluow dotdw,ynoxquoll
1.
.meistroddTVA sesaind
367
That the Letters of Request required the sanction and
approval of the Governor of Hongkong.
Jærið duo anténtog mibnstomer vi of xiqar ml
rettel hnossa a bobrawrot xot „4“ ‚wal ni baɗ erow anonser seedt
erew atatoq redbrut antwolfot arid dinidw al-radoto0 .238 -
в
On my pointing out that a precedent existed
in which Mr. Mansfield, when Consul-General, had complied with similar Letters of Request by availing himself of the Consular
Constable, Mr. Fox replied
·
that Mr. Mansfield's action was irregular.
7.
Many of these points are questions of Law
moltokbatul, oris darīs gatlım ya Iqaona don hivoo ad tart
orið ma þanidið ni #dootdwa naenkɗd of bahnatxa troð erit to
-oliqqa aham ad ton bluoo srubanorT Livið to shoɔ grodynоR
:Ji galnoisonne ydsord on raw staɗis bra
mmsis of aldam
sið nokzusvuod ooterft sis to II .= to murrty at JMIS
dokite at mouno (im stiupar trigim moitinuɗtuā sasalɗ3
yď stod baeuli a ul beint ed os atnebustab e^s beenido
which I cannot discuss. But in view of the general terms of the British Minister's letter in which it is said that Sir Edward'
Gray upholds the contention of the Acting Consul-General, which though it does not tally with Mr. Antrobus' letter, may
be the actual terms of Sir Edward Grey's despatch - and also
mit sotutue of ¿questa of sutv ad tou blươw #1 Juất
.1
with a view of indicating what the point in issue really is,
no Talent
70 kvizu estugoser of motuæð ui meiJiTod‡VA sasniɗ”
biwow yoɗt es (tivo) snoxynol eft to adnecmbut
●ystoonqtoon entuper oals bus banɔ odt yntracɗf»Ð¶ 'usoitto boug' wilt no soubliet sild of matrietor ni raft
«revo bar I motnað at sinw a galvise rot Iwanoð ent to oð ævilų a vino Ikowoð al teb1⁄40 wilt Jailt tosl edź bexoví,
.atov¿dum dimitira
gatvios aovLoanods arottolloë gnodanoli to ooktoærg and Jadr
boa "BluŋOTTİ Çİsmærêze na" nav nornag ni eaeminɔ no at ITW
•"galbosoorg eldianedorEST
4
I shall state briefly what the law is on se some of these points.
b.
The Jurisdiction, or to use the more correct term, the
4.9. competence of the Supreme Court of Hongkong over absent defendants, subjects or aliens, and therefore over Chinese subjects, has nothing whatever to do with the jurisdiction of the Chinese Courts over their own subjects.
The jurisdiction is concurrent.
A judgment by default cannot be obtained without service
of
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.